In a recent decision, the FCC interpreted its radio multiple ownership rules in a case involving changes in an Arbitron market.  The FCC’s rules restrict the number of radio stations that one company can own in a market based on how many stations are in that radio market.  In situations where stations are rated in an Arbitron market, the number of stations is determined by how many stations are in that Arbitron market, as determined by data compiled by the financial analysis firm BIA.  In this case, while the application to acquire the station was pending, BIA came out with its first list of stations that it considered to be in the newly created Arbitron market.  That list showed that, in the new market, the Buyer already owned more stations than allowed by the rules, so acquisition of this additional station was prohibited.  The case stands for the proposition that, while changes in Arbitron markets that allow an acquisition to take place must have been in place for two years to become effective (to prevent owners from gaming the system by making short-term changes), changes that adversely affect the ability of an owner to acquire a station become effective immediately.

According to the decision, at the time that the application in question was filed, the station to be bought was listed by BIA as being in the Manchester, New Hampshire Arbitron market.  The number of stations owned by the Buyer in Manchester was such that the acquisition of the station was permissible at the time the application was filed.  However, Arbitron announced the creation of a new Concord radio market just before the filing of the FCC application for approval of the transfer of control of the radio station.  Soon after the filing of the application, BIA released its list of stations in the new Concord market, and it included a number of the stations owned by Buyer, including the station it was proposing to acquire.  In the new Concord market, the Buyer would have too many stations to permit the acquisition of this station under the restrictions set out in the multiple ownership rules.

Continue Reading Adverse Change in Arbitron Market Blocks Radio Acquisition Under Multiple Ownership Rules

David Oxenford of DWT’s Washington DC office will speak at the 2008 Annual Conference of the Broadcast and Cable Financial Management Association in Dallas, Texas.  David will speak on a panel titled Music Licensing in a Digital Age and Other Website Issues along with a representative of BMI.  The session will be held on May 13.  A conference agenda is available here.

Update – May 15 – The PowerPoint presentation, summarizing issues for a broadcaster’s consideration in connection with its website operations, is available here. 

On April 14, David Oxenford was a speaker at the Radio and Internet Newsletter ("RAIN") annual summit, held in Las Vegas.  David spoke on music royalty issues, providing an update on the status of the royalties set last year by the Copyright Royalty Board (about which we have written extensively).  The full agenda for the Conference can be found here.

As we wrote last week, the FCC recently admonished two major broadcasters, each of which had a station group which had not complied with the FCC’s EEO rules.  In both cases, the FCC would have issued fines instead of the admonishments had it not been for renewal applications that were granted between the time of the violations and the FCC’s EEO audit that uncovered the issues.  This past week, the FCC issued another list of stations that will be audited to determine their EEO compliance.  The list of stations to be audited is here.  The FCC’s Public Notice of the audits is here.  As stated in the Notice, the FCC will audit 5% of all broadcast stations and all multi-channel video providers each year.  So expect more EEO audits in upcoming months.  To be sure that you are prepared to meet the FCC’s requirements for EEO compliance if your station is audited, see our EEO Compliance Guide, here.

David Oxenford spoke at the NAB Convention in Las Vegas on a panel titled "Coping with Copyright: From Performance Tax to Internet Streaming" dealing with dealing with Internet radio music royalties and the broadcast performance royalty.  The panel was held on April 15. Handouts included DWT’s memo "Copyright Royalty Board Releases Music Royalties for Internet Radio Streaming for 2006-2010—Clarifying the Confusion."

As we posted earlier, television stations must file an FCC Form 388 with the FCC reporting on their DTV educational efforts by April 10th.  That Form is now available on the FCC’s web page here.  However, stations should be aware of the unusual filing procedure required for this form.  This form will not be filed through CDBS, but rather will be filed through the FCC’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS), which is used for submitting comments in notice and comment rule making proceedings.  The ECFS submission page is available here.   Thus, stations will need to prepare the FCC Form 388 using the  Word document available on the FCC’s web site, and then electronically submit the completed Word document into Docket Number 07-148 using ECFS.  Although the new rules were only effective for one day of the First Quarter, stations should report any voluntary DTV educational efforts undertaken during the quarter. 

Quarterly Issues Programs Lists Due April 10th — This is a eminder to all radio and television stations, both commercial and noncommercial, that Quarterly Issues Programs Lists reporting on the important issues facing the stations’ communities, and the programs aired in the months of January, February, and March dealing with those issues must be prepared and placed in the stations’ public inspection file by April 10, 2008. The failure to have a complete set of Quarterly Issues Programs lists, which were timely prepared and placed in a station’s public file, can lead to significant fines at license renewal time so all stations are urged to prepare their Quarterly Issues Programs lists in a timely fashion. See our full advisory for further details.

Please note, the New Form 355 for television stations has not yet become effective, but when it does, television stations will be required to use this new form to report on their programming content in great detail.  Stations should prepare for the implementation of this form now. 

Children’s Program Reports Due April 10th —  Commercial full power and Class A low power television stations are reminded that Children’s Television Programming Reports on FCC Form 398 must be prepared and filed electronically with the FCC by April 10, 2008. The Reports must also be placed in the stations’ public inspection files by that date. Our recent advisory is available here with all the details, including the requirements for DTV stations airing multiple program streams and details about the new Form 398. Quarterly certifications regarding compliance with the commercial limitations in Children’s Programming should also be prepared and placed in the public inspection file by April 10th.

New Form 388 Report on DTV Educational Efforts Due April 10th — Last, and definitely not least, by April 10th full power television stations must electronically file the newly minted Form 388 reporting on their efforts to inform viewers about the DTV transition.  Although the FCC’s new rules mandating educational efforts by TV stations were only effective March 31st (the last day of the quarter), the FCC nevertheless is requiring that all stations file a report detailing their DTV education efforts during the First Quarter of 2008.  Thus, stations will largely be reporting on any voluntary educational efforts undertaken in the first quarter (PSAs, news programs, etc.), as well as electing which of the three Options that they intend to employ for their DTV educational efforts going forward.  More information is available in our recent advisory. 

We recently wrote about the Federal Communications Commission’s actions in their Diversity docket, designed to promote new entrants into the ranks of broadcast station owners. In addition to the rules adopted in the proceeding, the FCC is seeking comment on a number of other ideas – some to restrict the definition of the Designated Entities that are eligible to take advantage of these rules, others to expand the universe of media outlets available to potential broadcast owners – including proposals to expand the FM band onto TV channels 5 and 6, and proposals to allow certain AM stations, which were to be returned to the FCC after their owners received construction permits for expanded band stations, to retain those stations or transfer them to Designated Entities. The proposals, on which public comment is being sought, are summarized below.

Definition of Designated Entity. The first issue raised by the Commission deals with whether the class of applicants entitled to Designated Entity status and entitled to take advantage of the Commission’s diversity initiatives should be restricted. One proposal is to restrict the Designated Entity status to companies controlled by racial minorities. The Commission expressed skepticism about that proposal, noting that the courts had throw out several versions of the FCC’s EEO rules, finding that there was insufficient justification offered by the FCC to constitutionally justify raced-based preferences. The Commission asked that proponents of such preferences provide a “compelling” showing of needed, as necessary for a constitutional justification for governmental race-based discrimination.

Continue Reading FCC’s Acts to Increase Diversity in Media Ownership – Part 2, The Proposals for Future Actions – Channel 6 for FM, AM Expanded Band, Definition of Designated Entity, Must Carry for Class A TV and Others

The FCC today released a Public Notice stating that their DTV Consumer Education rules will go into effect on Monday, March 31, when they are published in the Federal Register. Thus, broadcast television stations need to immediately be prepared to start complying with these rules.  These rules require that broadasters pick from a set of three plans setting out very specific consumer education activities.  Under Option 1, the option which originated from the FCC, PSAs about the transition would need to start running immediately – 4 spots a day on Monday, and 8 a day on Tuesday, April 1.  We expect that most stations will follow Option 2 – the NAB plan – as it provides more flexibility. But even under the NAB plan, you will need to be running at least 16 30-second PSAs and 16 crawls, all providing information about the transition, during the coming week.  Noncommercial stations also have a third option.  For specific information on the requirements, see our memo on the requirements of the new rules, or review the full Commission order, here.

On April 10, stations will also need to file the new Form 388 for the first time.  On this form, stations will need to specify which of the Options they are selecting (an irrevocable option).  Stations will also need to detail the consumer education education efforts that they have engaged in over the previous quarter – which obviously would have been voluntary efforts prior to the effective date of the new rules on Monday.
Continue Reading FCC Rules on Consumer Education to Go Into Effect on Monday – Broadcast and Cable Systems Should Be Ready to Start Compliance Efforts Immediately

Under the compulsory license for the use of sound recordings – the license which allows Internet radio services to use all legally recorded sound recordings by paying a royalty set by the Copyright Royalty Board – the designated collection agency can, once each year, audit a licensee to assess its compliance with the royalty requirements.  Under the law, when the collective decides to audit a company, it must notify the Copyright Royalty Board, who then gives public notice of the fact that an audit is to take place.  The Copyright Royalty Board has just announced that SoundExchange has decided to audit Last.FM.  Based on a number of public statements, SoundExchange has been citing Last.FM as an example of problems with royalties – contending that Last.FM had paid royalties of only a couple of thousand dollars a year, under the Small Webcasters Settlement Act, just before selling out to CBS for over $200 million.  Given SoundExchange’s tough talk about Last.FM, this notice of an audit is not surprising.  SoundExchange’s focus on this company illustrates the difficulty of valuing music use, and the different perceptions of music users and copyright holders as to what that value should be.

 In past years, SoundExchange has audited a number of webcasters – usually large webcasters.  As SoundExchange must bear the cost of the audit unless a significant underpayment is discovered, it is unlikely that more than a few companies will be audited each year.  However, as SoundExchange has made such a big deal of Last.FM, with witnesses on performance royalty issues mentioning it at Congressional hearings, and representatives mentioning it on various industry conferences (including SoundExchange President John Simson’s reference to the company on a panel on which we jointly appeared at Canadian Music Week earlier this month), many expected that an audit would be forthcoming.

Continue Reading SoundExchange to Audit Internet Radio Royalty Payments of Last.FM – What is the Value of Music?