• The language of the AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act, which would mandate the inclusion of AM radios in all

Several recent broadcast trade press articles summarized a Public Notice released this past week by the FCC’s Media Bureau.  The Notice deals with the processing of certain broadcast applications when a licensee has a pending “remedial” petition for declaratory ruling seeking to correct noncompliance with the Commission’s foreign ownership rules.  The articles suggest that the Public Notice would have wide impact, and that several pending applications would be held up by the FCC’s new processing policy.  In fact, this decision is limited in its application only to broadcasters who, through no fault of their own, find that they no longer comply with the foreign ownership limits set out in Section 310(b) of the Communications Act and ask in a “remedial petition” for what is essentially retroactive approval of the foreign ownership that exceeds the 25% limit imposed on aggregate foreign interests (voting or equity) in companies that control broadcast licensees. 

The Public Notice does not deal with companies who ask for permission to have foreign ownership in excess of 25% in advance of those owners acquiring their interests.  In cases where a controlling interest in the company is proposed to be held by foreign owners who have not previously been approved by the Commission, specific FCC approval is required for that acquisition to occur through a forward-looking petition for declaratory ruling.  That is not a “remedial petition.”  Similarly, the Public Notice has no impact on companies that filed Petitions seeking approval for future changes in ownership that would exceed the 25% ownership threshold but would not involve a change in control.  Where a company is seeking advance approval for a non-controlling foreign interest in excess of 25%, the processing of currently pending applications by the company should not be impacted. 

Continue Reading FCC Media Bureau Public Notice on Processing Applications When “Remedial” Foreign Ownership Petition Is Pending – What Is It All About?
  • The FCC’s Media Bureau released a Public Notice requesting comment on the TV Parental Guidelines ratings system.  In 1996, Congress
  • FCC Chairman Carr stated in a cable news interview that the FCC could investigate broadcasters and their on-air personalities for
  • The FCC’s Media Bureau released a Public Notice purporting to remind broadcasters about their lowest unit charge (LUC) obligations for

The unusual story of the sale of TEGNA Inc. has seemingly (more on that below) come to an end after a four-year FCC review process, encompassing two attempted purchases, two administrative actions involving multiple rule waivers and novel questions of law, but no rulings by the Commissioners themselves. On Thursday, the FCC’s Media Bureau issued an order approving the transfer of control of the company to Nexstar Media and the deal was closed by the parties that same day.  Today, we look back at the unusual actions leading to the sale of TEGNA and at what last week’s approval may preview as to major changes ahead for the broadcast industry .

The unusual nature of the sale of TEGNA did not start with last week’s decision but instead began in 2022 when TEGNA first announced its plan to be acquired by Standard General.  After an application seeking approval for that sale was filed, objections were submitted from labor organizations, public interest groups, and representatives from the multichannel video provider community.  Despite divestiture plans to bring Standard General into compliance with the FCC’s television ownership rules, in 2023, the FCC’s Media Bureau, after a full year of consideration, decided that it could not reach a decision on the case, but that the case had to be reviewed by an FCC Administrative Law Judge to hold a hearing to decide two issues – neither of which had ever been the source for the rejection of a broadcast sale in the past. 

Continue Reading FCC Media Bureau Approves Nexstar’s Acquisition of TEGNA – What Does It Mean for Consideration of the Broadcast Ownership Rules?