- The FCC released a draft Notice of Inquiry to explore how the FCC can support industry efforts to develop new
Top 4 TV combinations
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: June 17, 2024 to June 21, 2024
- The FCC’s Media Bureau asked for comments on a petition for rulemaking proposing the creation of a new class of
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: February 12, 2024 to February 16, 2024
- The FCC announced that March 18 is the effective date of the rules adopted in its December 2023 Report and Order
The Last Three Weeks in Regulation for Broadcasters: December 18, 2023 to January 5, 2024
Expecting quiet weeks, we took the holidays off from providing our weekly summary of regulatory actions of interest to broadcasters. But, during that period, there actually were many regulatory developments. Here are some of those developments, with links to where you can go to find more information as to how these actions may affect your…
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: December 11 to December 15, 2023
- The FCC adopted a Report and Order establishing rules implementing the January 2023 Low Power Protection Act, which provides
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: December 4 to December 8, 2023
- The AM for Every Vehicle Act was scheduled for a US Senate vote this week through an expedited process
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: November 20 to December 1, 2023
- The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau partially granted NAB and REC Networks’ waiver request (discussed in our
Court Orders FCC to Complete Quadrennial Review by December 27 – What are the Issues for Review by the Commission?
Last week, as we noted in our weekly summary of regulatory actions of importance to broadcasters, the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an Order directing the FCC to complete its 2018 Quadrennial Regulatory Review of its broadcast ownership rules by December 27, 2023, or show cause why the National Association of Broadcasters’s (NAB) Petition for Writ of Mandamus should not be granted. The NAB’s petition, filed in April 2023, requests that the D.C. Circuit compel the FCC to conclude the agency’s still-pending 2018 review. Neither last week’s order, nor any mandamus order that could be issued by the Court should the FCC fail to finish its review by December 27, will compel any particular decision. Instead, such an order would only require that the FCC finish the review started in 2018 (see our article here on the start of that review process).
The Quadrennial Review process is mandated by Congress. Every four years, the FCC is required to review its local ownership rules and determine which ones remain in the public interest. The NAB’s argument to the Court has been that the FCC failed to meet its statutory obligation by not completing the 2018 review last year. In December, we wrote about the FCC’s failure to complete the Quadrennial Review, and how the inaction has forestalled any review of the issues that were teed up in that review. What were those issues?Continue Reading Court Orders FCC to Complete Quadrennial Review by December 27 – What are the Issues for Review by the Commission?
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: June 5 to June 9, 2023
- On Tuesday, the Communications and Technology Subcommittee of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce held a hearing, “Listen Here:
Looking Into the Crystal Ball – What’s Coming in Broadcast Regulation in 2023 From the FCC
It’s a new year, and it’s time to look ahead at what Washington may have in store for broadcasters this year. The FCC may be slow to tackle some of the big issues on its agenda (like the completion of 2018 Quadrennial Review or any other significant partisan issue) as it still has only four Commissioners – two Democrats and two Republicans. On controversial issues like changes to the ownership rules, there tends to be a partisan divide. As the nomination of Gigi Sohn expired at the end of the last Congress in December, the Biden administration was faced with the question of whether to renominate her and hope that the confirmation process moves more quickly this time, or to come up with a new nominee whose credentials will be reviewed by the Senate. It was announced this week that the administration has decided to renominate her, meaning that her confirmation process will begin anew. How long that process takes and when the fifth commissioner is seated may well set the tone for what actions the FCC takes in broadcast regulation this year.
Perhaps the most significant issue at the FCC facing broadcasters is the resolution of the 2018 Quadrennial Review to assess the current local ownership rules and determine if they are still in the public interest. As we wrote last week, the FCC has already started the 2022 review, as required by Congress, even though it has not resolved the issues raised in the 2018 review. For the radio industry, those issues include the potential relaxation of the local radio ownership rules. As we have written, some broadcasters and the NAB have pushed the FCC to recognize that the radio industry has significantly changed since the ownership limits were adopted in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and local radio operators need a bigger platform from which to compete with the new digital companies that compete for audience and advertising in local markets. Other companies have been reluctant to endorse changes – but even many of them recognize that relief from the ownership limits on AM stations would be appropriate.Continue Reading Looking Into the Crystal Ball – What’s Coming in Broadcast Regulation in 2023 From the FCC
