When a problem arises with a station that could give rise to a fine, how long does the FCC have to act on that complaint and issue a fine? How long must a licensee worry about that problem and whether it will result in a fine? Does a sale cut off liability for a
FCC forfeiture
When Is An FCC Fine Too Big? – Analyze Licensee Gross Income to Determine Hardship (For Noncommercial Licensees Too)
In three cases released in the last week, the FCC grappled with the issue of when the amount of a fine (or a "forfeiture" as the FCC refers to it) imposed on a broadcaster for a violation of an FCC rule is too much to be sustained. Clearly, the FCC wants a fine for a violation of…
FCC’s Assessment of $30,000 Fine Reminds Television Stations to Publicize the Existence and Location of Children’s Television Programming Reports
The FCC today issued a Forfeiture Order imposing a $30,000 fine on the licensee of three television stations for the stations’ failure to publicize the existence and location of the Children’s Television Reports for the Stations. Even at a rate of $10,000 per station, this fine is significant and should serve as a loud, clear…
FCC Cuts No Slack on Fines – Temporarily Unfenced Tower, Expired STA, Former Owner – All Draw Fines
The FCC today issued three orders imposing fines on broadcasters – cutting no slack to anyone. These cases demonstrate how important strict compliance with all FCC rules is to avoid fines before the current Commission. The first decision imposed a fine of $2800 on a broadcaster for having an unfenced tower – where the broadcaster claimed that the fence was temporarily removed to facilitate the clearing of brush as required by local authorities to remove a potential fire hazard. While the FCC seemed to recognize that the fence removal was temporary, and that it was missing for only a few weeks while weed killer was being applied at the site, the Commission still imposed the fine – requiring that access to an AM tower always be restricted, prohibiting open access even for a short period.
The second case was a decision which imposed a fine of $2000 on a broadcaster for operating from an unauthorized transmitter site. While the broadcaster had received Special Temporary Authority (an "STA") to operate from the site, the STA expired. The broadcaster filed an extension request, but forgot to include the filing fee check. The broadcaster claims that he re-filed the request, and had a canceled check to prove it, although the Commission had no record of the re-filed STA (though the FCC did acknowledge having received the check). Finding that it had no record of the re-filed STA, and further finding that the applicant should have inquired about the failure to receive an STA extension after 180 days (the length of an STA), the Commission imposed the fine on the broadcaster. While this case is certainly complicated by the missing extension request, given the canceled check one would assume that broadcaster must have filed something, and the FCC’s usual rule is that if an STA extension is on file, the station can continue to operate. Of course, with an extension that was pending for 2 years, probably some inquiry was warranted. But whether it was a $2000 mistake is a different question.Continue Reading FCC Cuts No Slack on Fines – Temporarily Unfenced Tower, Expired STA, Former Owner – All Draw Fines