Television

Subscribe to Television via RSS

Last Friday, the FCC released its Order adopting the regulatory fees to be paid by broadcasters and other regulated entities at some point before the October 1 start of the federal government’s new fiscal year.  The Commission slightly increased fees for TV stations by 1.2% from last year (from $0.006598 to $0.006674 per population served)…

It is time for our look at September’s regulatory dates and deadlines to which broadcasters should be paying attention – and the deadline that probably is most important to all commercial broadcasters is not yet known.  That, of course, is the deadline for the payment of annual regulatory fees – which must be made before the federal government’s October 1 start of the new fiscal year.  We expect an announcement of the final decision on the amount of those fees for various broadcasters, and the deadlines for payment, in the next few days.  Keep on the alert for that announcement. 

Below is our summary of the other dates affecting broadcasters this September, including the effective date of the Emergency Alert System’s (“EAS”) new Missing and Endangered Persons event code, comment and other pleading deadlines in several FCC proceedings, the deadline for affected broadcasters to file their responses to the FCC’s August 2025 EEO Audit Letter, in addition to several political file window dates.

September 8 is the effective date of the new EAS Missing and Endangered Persons event code to be used by all EAS Participants, including broadcast stations.  In August 2024, the FCC adopted a Report and Order creating a new EAS event code for persons over the age of 17 who are missing or abducted from states, territories, or tribal communities (known as Ashanti Alerts), but delayed its effective date to provide EAS Participants with enough time to update their EAS systems to use the code.Continue Reading September 2025 Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters – FCC Regulatory Fees, Political Windows, EAS Event Code, Rulemaking Comment Deadlines, and more

  • The Radio Music License Committee announced settlements with both ASCAP and BMI of rate court litigation over the royalties to
…
…

In our recent post on the FCC’s first EEO audit of the Carr administration at the FCC, we expressed surprise that the audit was released, thinking that the Commission might move to revise the EEO rules and put enforcement of the current rules on hold, just as it has done with the Biennial Ownership Reports.  In the remainder of our article, we went on to discuss the audit as if it was simply asking for information to review the FCC’s EEO rules as they have been enforced for the last 20 years.  But thanks to another attorney who more closely reviewed the language of the FCC’s audit letter and alerted me to changes in these letters, we now know that the audits actually go beyond the issues previously reviewed by the FCC – and seek out information about programs that favor one race, ethnicity or gender in hiring and other employment evaluations.  The audits now seem to be aimed in part at seeking out the types of “invidious” DEI programs – Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion — that the current administration has labeled as discriminatory in and of themselves in transactions involving the biggest players in the communications industry.  The FCC now seems to be looking for evidence of these DEI programs at all broadcast stations, just as they are seeking to root out and end these policies in other industries throughout the country.

In looking closely at the new audit letters, the Enforcement Bureau has added four paragraphs requiring the audited station to respond to various DEI questions. First, section 2(b)(vi)(a) of the letter asks about any complaints made by employees either internally to station management or externally to relevant authorities of “any bias, sensitivity or any other matters related to race, color, religion, national origin or sex.”  While that wording is not the clearest, it appears that this question is looking for complaints alleging that employment decisions were improperly made with a bias or other preferences favoring persons of a particular race, ethnicity, religion or gender.  In the past, only complaints of discrimination that led to disfavoring persons based on those qualities were reported.  Plus, in the past, only complaints to government agencies were reported.  Here, information about internal complaints and how such complaints were dealt with by the station are requested, as is information as to internal station policies of how such complaints should be treated.Continue Reading A Closer Look At the FCC’s First EEO Notice of 2025 –  New Questions to Root Out DEI Issues

Update – 8/12/2025 – See our new article here for updated information on the DEI questions we discovered were included in these EEO audit letters. Those questions are not mentioned in the article below.

On Friday, the FCC released its first EEO audit notice for 2025 – and the first to be issued under the new administration at the FCC.  The FCC’s Public Notice, audit letter, and the list of the 400 radio and TV stations selected for audit is available here.  Those stations, and the station employment units (commonly owned or controlled stations serving the same area sharing at least one employee) with which they are associated, must provide to the FCC (by uploading the information to their online public inspection file) their last two years of EEO Annual Public File reports, as well as backing data to show that the station in fact did everything that was required under the FCC rules.  The response to this audit is due to be uploaded to the public file of affected stations by September 22, 2025. The audit notice says that, if an employment unit selected in this audit was audited in 2023 or 2024, or if their renewal was granted after June 1, 2023, it should notify the FCC, and it might be exempted from the audit. Any station having a question, or needing more time to respond, is instructed to contact the FCC at least 5 days before the September 22 deadline. 

In some ways, the release of this Notice was a surprise.  The first EEO audit of the year usually comes much earlier in the calendar, leading to speculation that, as compliance with the current EEO program was mentioned as imposing regulatory burdens that warranted review in the FCC’s Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding, the FCC might be suspending audits while considering the proposals for reform (similar to the waiver granted for Biennial Ownership Reports we wrote about on Friday, where we suggested that the current EEO rules might also be reviewed).  But it appears that the FCC has decided to move forward with its existing policy of randomly auditing approximately 5% of all broadcast stations each year.Continue Reading FCC Issues First EEO Audit Notice of 2025 – To Audit 300 Radio and TV Stations

  • The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau announced that October 3 is the deadline for EAS Participants, including broadcasters,
…

Last week, as we noted in our last regular summary of the prior week’s regulatory activity, the FCC’s Media Bureau announced that it had waived the requirement for broadcasters to file their next Biennial Ownership Reports while the FCC considers whether to even continue to require the use of this form.  Ownership reports were set to be filed by December 1 of this year, reporting on a broadcaster’s ownership as of October 1.  The obligation to file this report has now been extended to June 1, 2027, unless the FCC concludes its review before that date and announces a different filing requirement.  The Media Bureau made clear that ownership reports required at other times (e.g., after the consummation of an assignment or transfer of broadcast station licenses or after the grant of a construction permit for a new station) are still required.  It is simply the Biennial Report required from all full-power broadcasters and from LPTV licensees that has been put on hold.

The Bureau based this extension on its intent to review whether this form continues to be necessary.  As pointed out in some of the comments filed in the Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding, the Biennial Ownership report did not provide any information necessary for any purely regulatory purpose.  Baseline ownership information about licensees is provided in applications seeking authority to operate a station (either through acquisition from an existing licensee or through a construction permit to build a new station) and again reported in the ownership reports required after the grant of such applications.  While incremental changes not requiring FCC approval may be made in the interim (and would be captured on the Biennial Report), if there are any changes in the control of a licensee, those first need FCC approval.  The Biennial Reports themselves do not trigger any FCC review or approval.  One of the principal reasons for the adoption of the requirement for these biennial filings was to capture a snapshot of broadcast ownership that could potentially be used for FCC affirmative action considerations.  Only the Biennial Ownership Reports require the identification of the race and gender of individuals who hold interests in broadcast stations.  Given the current administration’s position on these race- and gender-based governmentally-imposed affirmative action obligations, it is perhaps no surprise that this justification for the filing of these reports appears likely be insufficient to justify the continued use of these forms.  This action to put the Biennial Report on hold does raise the question of what other routine broadcast filing obligations may also be under review in the Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding.Continue Reading FCC Delays Filing Date for Biennial Ownership Report While Considering Its Value – What Other Broadcast Regulatory Obligations May Be Under Review?

  • The FCC’s Media Bureau waived the requirement that broadcasters file their biennial ownership reports by December 1 of this year,
…

Although many, including Congress, take the last of their summer vacations in August, there are still many dates to which broadcasters should be paying attention this month.  One deadline that most commercial broadcasters should be anticipating is the FCC’s order that will set the amount of their Annual Regulatory Fees, which will be paid sometime in September before the October 1 start of the federal government’s new fiscal year.  As we noted here, the FCC proposed to decrease fees this year for broadcasters from the amounts paid in prior years.  Also, as we noted here, the FCC has adopted a new regulatory fee calculation methodology for earth stations.  Watch for the announcement of the final amounts for the Annual Regulatory Fees, along with an announcement of the deadline for their payment.  These announcements usually come in late August or in the first few days of September. 

Here are some of the other regulatory deadlines this month:

August 1 the deadline for radio and television station employment units in California, Illinois, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Wisconsin with five or more full-time employees to upload their Annual EEO Public File Report to their stations’ Online Public Inspection Files.  A station employment unit is a station or cluster of commonly controlled stations serving the same general geographic area having at least one common employee.  For employment units with five or more full-time employees, the annual report covers hiring and employment outreach activities for the prior year.  A link to the uploaded report must also be included on the home page of each station’s website, if the station has a website.  Be timely getting these reports into your station’s OPIF, as even a single late report has in the past lead to significant FCC fines (see our article here about a recent $26,000 fine for a single late EEO report).Continue Reading August 2025 Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters – Watching for the Annual Reg Fee Announcement, EEO Annual Filings, Comment Deadlines, and Political Windows