Emergency Communications

Subscribe to Emergency Communications via RSS

The FCC’s recent Notice of Proposed Rule Making outlining changes to the FCC’s Part 11 Rules governing the Emergency Alert System ("EAS") was published in the Federal Register today.  Today’s publication establishes the timing for submitting Comments in this proceeding.  Comments will be due by July 20, with Reply Comments due by August 4th.  By its…

The date for a nationwide test of the Emergency Alert System ("EAS") was announced by the FCC last week, at the same meeting at which the Future of Media report was delivered.  The first ever national test of EAS will occur at 2 PM EST on November 9, 2011. As we wrote in February, the FCC amended its rules to provide for a nationwide test, in addition to the weekly and monthly tests that are already part of the FCC rules.  The nationwide test is to assess the reliability and effectiveness of EAS in being able to convey to the public a Presidential alert.  This test comes at the same time as the FCC has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to consider amendments to its rules to provide for the conversion to a new method of disseminating EAS alerts – using the Common Alert Protocol (CAP) which is IP based, rather than reliant on the daisy chain over-the-air system that has been used for so long.  One question is whether the deadline for CAP implementation, presently set for September 30, should be extended.  Thoughts about the test and the FCC proposals for CAP implementation are set out below. 

The Nationwide test, even though it will not use the CAP system (which in and of itself may show that the Commission has already recognized that the September 30 CAP implementation deadline will be extended), is still very important for broadcasters.  The FCC, in coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency ("FEMA"), will use the results of the test to determine what problems exist in the EAS system and what improvements are necessary to ensure that the EAS functions as a robust public warning system.  As broadcasters in recent years have highlighted their participation in EAS, and the important role that it plays in alerting communities to emergency situations, in connection with many initiatives (including the push to put FM chips in cell phones), broadcasters want to make sure that their performance during the upcoming test will be up to the level that the FCC expects. As all EAS participants will have to report to the FCC on the results of the test, all participants should use the period between now and November to assure that their systems are working and ready to fulfill their obligations under the rules. No broadcaster, cable system or other participant wants to be in the position of having to report to the FCC that their equipment was malfunctioning on the date of the test. And, certainly, no participant wants to forget to file the necessary report when due.Continue Reading Updates on EAS – A Nationwide Test, and Lots of Questions About CAP Implementation Including Whether More Time is Needed

At the urging of virtually the entire broadcast and cable industry, as well as the communications engineering community, the FCC today granted an extension of time for broadcasters and other EAS participants to come into compliance with the new CAP reception requirements – putting off the need for compliance until September 30, 2011.  CAP (the Common Alerting…

In yet another example of the importance that the FCC places on emergency communications and safety issues, an FCC Enforcement Bureau District Field Office issued a Notice of Apparent Liability, proposing to fine a radio station $25,000 for violations including an EAS system that was not operational, as well as a tower that needed repainting and with lights that were not functioning properly.  Together with various other issues – including missing quarterly issues programs lists – the FCC found that a $25,000 fine was appropriate.  This is another in a series of recent notices of apparent liability from FCC District Offices, demonstrating the high cost of noncompliance with technical and operational issues at broadcast stations.

On the tower issues, the FCC found that the tower lights, which were required to be flashing, were in either not operational at all or not flashing, and that the licensee admitted that no visual inspection of the lights had occurred in at least a week.  Citing Section 17.47 of the FCC rules, which require a visual inspection of tower lights every 24 hours unless there is an automatic inspection system (which was not present at this tower), the FCC found that there was a violation here.  In addition, the inspection revealed that the tower paint was faded and, in some places, had peeled to reveal bare steel, as the tower had not been painted since 1996.  Towers must be cleaned and painted "as often as necessary to maintain good visibility" under Section 17.50 of the FCC Rules.  The failure of the tower owner to monitor the tower lights resulted in a $2000 fine, and a $10,000 fine was imposed for the failure to repaint the tower.Continue Reading $25,000 FCC Fine for Safety Related Issues – No EAS, Tower With Painting and Lighting Issues

Earlier this week, I posted a Top Ten list of legal issues that should keep a broadcast station operator up at night.  In two orders released today, the FCC found stations where these issues apparently had not been keeping their operators awake, as the FCC issued fines for numerous violations.  At one station, the FCC found that the EAS monitor was not working, the fence around the AM tower site was unlocked, and the station had no public inspection file, resulting in a $5500 fine (see the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau order here).  At another station, the FCC inspectors were told that the station had no public file, and they also found the AM tower site fence unlocked, resulting in a $3500 fine (see the order here).  These cases are one more example that, while broadcasters have plenty of big-picture legal and policy issues that they need to be concerned about, they also need to worry about the nuts and bolts, as the failure to observe basic regulatory requirements like tower fencing, EAS, and public file requirements can bring immediate financial penalties to a station. 

The tower fencing issue is one that we have written about before.  FCC rules require that public access be restricted to areas of high RF radiation, which are likely to occur at ground levels near AM stations.  The FCC has many times issued fines for fences with unlocked gates, holes, or areas where there are gullies where a child could climb under the fence into the tower area.  The FCC has been  unwilling to accept excuses that the fence was locked "yesterday" or "last week" or at some other less defined time in the absence of proof, as they’ve heard that excuse many time.  If the fence is open when they arrive, expect a fine.Continue Reading Non-Functioning EAS, An Unavailable Public File and Open Tower Site Gates Result in FCC Fines of $5500 and $3500

As summarized by Brian Hurh on our sister site broadbandlawadvisor.com, yesterday the FCC’s Consumer and Government Affairs Bureau released a Public Notice seeking comments to refresh the record on closed captioning that was last addressed in the Commission’s 2005 and 2008 Closed Captioning NPRMs. As recognized by the Commission, much has happened since those…

Update 10/15/10:  A copy of the Davis Wright Tremaine advisory published on October 13 is now available here and provides further details about the new accessibility Act.

Last week Congress adopted legislation to promote the accessibility of communications and media services. The law, entitled the “Twenty First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010”, is expected to be signed into law by President Obama, possibly as early as today, October 8th. The Act contains a number of changes to improve media accessibility, the most notable of which for broadcasters and cable operators is the reinstatement of the Commission’s defunct Video Description rules. The Act reinstates the FCC’s prior video description rules adopted in 2000 and subsequently struck down by the Court of Appeals in the case of MPAA v. FCC following a challenge to the rules by the Motion Picture Association of America, the National Association of Broadcasters, and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association.  At the time, the Court found that the FCC did not have the authority to adopt  video description rules, but Congress has now eliminated that issue by specifically authorizing the FCC to promulgate such rules and instructing it to reinstate the earlier regulations. 

We are currently in the process of reviewing and summarizing the new legislation and expect to publish shortly a Davis Wright Tremaine advisory with complete details and a time line for implementation. Once that advisory is published, we’ll update this post and provide a link.   In the meantime, some of the highlights and specifics of the Act are detailed below:  

The Act effectively reinstates video description rules adopted in 2000 as 47 CFR § 79.3 and struck down in MPAA v. FCC.  The rules will go into effect within one year after enactment (i.e. by October 2011).  Those rules will initially require that:

  1. Affiliates of the Big 4 Networks (ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC) in the top 25 DMAs will have to provide 50 hrs./quarter of prime time or children’s programming with video description
  2. The top 5 national nonbroadcast (i.e. cable) networks, must provide 50 hrs./quarter of programming with video description;
  3. Broadcast stations and MVPDs with technical capability to do so generally must pass through video descriptions.

Before the rules go into effect, the FCC will conduct a rule making to make certain modifications to the 2000 rules including:

  1. Updating the list of top 25 DMAs and top 5 cable networks, determining the first calendar quarter in which video description compliance will be required, and the phase-in for compliance;
  2. specifying that the rules apply to television programming in digital format only;
  3. specifying that live or near-live programming is not covered;
  4. creating a way for covered programming providers or owners to seek exemptions
  5. allowing FCC to exempt services, programs, and/or equipment (or classes thereof) based on economic burden

After all the above is complete, the rules as modified may be expanded to require a greater number of hours of video-described programming per quarter and to expand the television markets that must comply.  However, such expansion of the rules would only be after the FCC provides Congress with a report on the financial, technical, and operational costs associated with video descriptions, and the availability, use, and benefits of video descriptions.  According to the Act, the Commission may not issue additional regulations unless the Commission determines, at least two years after completing the required reports, that the need and benefit of the rules outweighs the costs of providing additional programming. Continue Reading Video Description Returns to Television, Closed Captioning Expands to the Internet

This afternoon, FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) adopted the new digital message format for the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) standard.  The adoption of this message format is the next step in the implementation of Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS), which expands the traditional Emergency Alert System used by radio and television to…

The FCC recently fined a station $8500 for not having an operational EAS system for almost two years, and for not having a main studio that was manned during normal business hours. The EAS fine was evident, as the station did not dispute that it did not have an operational EAS system in place.  It did, however…