Skip to content

Broadcast Law Blog

Discussion of FCC, copyright, advertising and other legal issues of importance to radio and television broadcasters and other media companies

Published by
David Oxenford logo

Principal Editor: David O’Connor

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
David Oxenford logo

This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters:  June 12 to June 16, 2023

By David Oxenford & Robert Primosch on June 18, 2023
Posted in FCC Fines, General FCC, Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report, License Renewal, Low Power Television/Class A TV, Noncommercial Broadcasting, On Line Media, Programming Regulations, Public Interest Obligations/Localism, Television

Here are some of the regulatory developments of significance to broadcasters from the past week, with links to where you can go to find more information as to how these actions may affect your operations.

  • The Senate Commerce, Science, and Technology Committee announced that it will hold a hearing on June 22, 2023 on the nomination of Anna Gomez to fill the long-vacant seat on the FCC, as well as on the renominations of Commissioners Carr and Starks.  We wrote about these nominations, and the broadcast issues that a full Commission might tackle, in a recent article on our Broadcast Law Blog. The hearing will also consider the nomination of a new Inspector General for the FCC.
  • The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act designed to allow news creators, including broadcasters, to negotiate jointly without antitrust concerns with Big Tech platforms over the rates and terms to be paid by those platforms for use of the news creators’ content.  A summary of the bill is available on Senator Klobuchar’s website.  To become law, the bill still must be passed by the full Senate and the House of Representatives and signed by the President. A similar bill was passed by the Committee last year but died as it was not approved by Congress before the end of the last Congressional term.
  • The FCC’s Media Bureau issued a Public Notice announcing that the Report and Order updating the FCC’s Part 74 rules to reflect the transition of low power television and television translator stations to digital operation will go into effect on June 12.  These rule changes do not materially affect the basic regulatory obligations of LPTV or TV translators now operating with digital facilities. The June 12 effective date does not apply to rules that change paperwork obligations, as these changes must undergo a Paperwork Reduction Act Review and will become effective after the FCC publishes notice of the Office of Management and Budget’s approval of the changes.  The Bureau stated that it would issue a future Public Notice announcing the effective date of the updated rules that require OMB approval. In a previous weekly update, we noted some of the changes adopted in this Order. 
  • The Media Bureau issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture to a television station in Silver Spring, Maryland, proposing to fine the station $18,000 for allegedly violating the FCC’s public file requirements.  The Bureau’s review of the stations online public inspection file indicated that since the prior renewal of the station’s license, the station had uploaded ten issues/programs lists more than one year late; three issues/programs lists between one month and one year late; and one issues/programs list more than one month late.  The station argued that its failure to upload these required reports was the result of confusion as to the station’s operational responsibilities when it entered a channel sharing agreement after surrendering its former channel in the television incentive auction.  The Bureau rejected this argument as, under a channel-sharing arrangement, each licensee maintains its own individual license and has an independent obligation to comply with all regulatory requirements.
  • The FCC’s Media Bureau entered into a Consent Decree with a Pennsylvania FM broadcast station for failure to file its 2014 and 2022 license renewal applications by their respective deadlines.  In addition, the Consent Decree noted that the station had yet to pay a fine assessed in 2015 for the 2014 late-filed renewal.  Finally, the Bureau said that its review of the station’s online public inspection file revealed that the station had not uploaded a single Quarterly Issues Programs List for the entire current renewal period until November 2022.  The Consent Decree requires the station to pay a civil penalty of $3,000 – which includes the station’s unpaid fine of $1,500.  The fine is to be paid in installments which suggests that the licensee made a financial hardship showing to avoid a more significant fine for the identified violations. The Consent Decree also mandates that the station implement a compliance plan requiring periodic reporting to the FCC so that it can monitor the station’s performance for at least a year.
  • The Media Bureau reversed its prior selection of the tentative selectee from a group of mutually exclusive NCE FM applications for different communities in Texas, and chose an applicant for a new NCE FM station at Riesel, Texas as the new tentative selectee.  The applications had been filed during the FCC’s November 2021 NCE FM filing window.  The Riesel applicant had alleged that the prior tentative selectee should not have been given a preference for its greater coverage as it had misrepresented the fair distribution population figures in its application by excluding two stations from its calculations.  The prior tentative selectee subsequently amended its application to withdraw its claim for a fair distribution preference, leaving the Riesel applicant as the only applicant that had claimed that coverage preference, so it became the new tentative selectee.
Tags: Anna Gomez, big tech, digital LPTV, Journalism Competition and Preservation Act, NCE points system, noncommercial FM applications, quarterly issues programs lists, TV channel sharing
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
July 2025 Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters –Quarterly Issues/Programs Lists, Comment Deadlines, Political Windows, and more
June 24, 2025
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters:  June 16, 2025 to June 20, 2025
June 21, 2025
FCC Announces Effective Date of Modifications to Rules Governing the Purchase of Broadcast Airtime By Agents of Foreign Governments
June 19, 2025

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • July 2025 Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters –Quarterly Issues/Programs Lists, Comment Deadlines, Political Windows, and more
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters:  June 16, 2025 to June 20, 2025
  • FCC Announces Effective Date of Modifications to Rules Governing the Purchase of Broadcast Airtime By Agents of Foreign Governments
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters:  June 9, 2025 to June 13, 2025
  • FCC Loses Two Commissioners and a Quorum – What Does It Mean for Broadcasting?

Topics

  • About this Blog
  • Advertising Issues
  • AM Radio
  • Appearances
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Assignments and Transfers
  • Broadcast Auctions
  • Broadcast Performance Royalty
  • Cable Carriage
  • Children's Programming and Advertising
  • Digital Radio
  • Digital Television
  • Drones
  • EEO Compliance/Diversity
  • Emergency Communications
  • Fairness Doctrine
  • FCC Fees
  • FCC Fines
  • FM Radio
  • FM Translators and LPFM
  • General FCC
  • Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report
  • Indecency
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet Radio
  • Internet Video
  • License Renewal
  • Low Power Television/Class A TV
  • Multiple Ownership Rules
  • Music Rights
  • Noncommercial Broadcasting
  • On Line Media
  • Payola and Sponsorship Identification
  • Podcasting
  • Political Broadcasting
  • Privacy
  • Programming Regulations
  • Public Interest Obligations/Localism
  • Security
  • Television
  • Tower Issues
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Issues
Photo of David OxenfordDavid OxenfordPartner

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the…

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the Federal Communications Commission, the Copyright Royalty Board, courts and other government agencies for over 30 years.

Show more Show less
Photo of David O'ConnorDavid O'ConnorPartner

David has coordinated the purchase and sale of numerous radio and television stations, and has helped telecommunications companies, industry associations, broadcasters, educational institutions and others…

David has coordinated the purchase and sale of numerous radio and television stations, and has helped telecommunications companies, industry associations, broadcasters, educational institutions and others with FCC compliance matters and advocacy in regulatory proceedings, such as those related to new technologies, media ownership, and spectrum allocations. David also advises voice and data providers on issues related to Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) for the deaf and hard of hearing, including Internet-based Video Relay Services (VRS) and IP Captioned Telephone Service (IP CTS), and otherwise helps clients with all of their FCC-related needs.

Show more Show less

Archives

David Oxenford logo
1800 M Street NW
Suite 800N
Washington, DC 20036
Fax: 202.783.5851
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

ABOUT

David is a partner at the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP, practicing out of its Washington, DC office. He has represented broadcasters for over 30 years on a wide array of matters from the negotiation and structuring of station purchase and sale agreements to regulatory matters. His regulatory expertise includes all areas of broadcast law including the FCC’s multiple ownership limitations, the political broadcasting rules, EEO policy, advertising issues, and other programming matters and FCC technical rules.

Read More...
Copyright © 2025, David Oxenford. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo