Skip to content

Broadcast Law Blog

Discussion of FCC, copyright, advertising and other legal issues of importance to radio and television broadcasters and other media companies

Published by
David Oxenford logo

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
David Oxenford logo

The Latest on the TV Incentive Auction – More Regional Information Sessions by the FCC for Auction that Still Appears Targeted for 2016

By David Oxenford on April 22, 2015
Posted in Broadcast Auctions, Digital Television, Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report, Television

The FCC yesterday announced a number of new regional information sessions on the TV incentive auction, by which the FCC proposes to purchase the spectrum of some TV stations to resell that spectrum to wireless users. At these seminars, the FCC representatives will answer questions from the stations attending, and schedule private meetings with TV owners to discuss the specifics of the amounts that they will initially be offered to surrender their spectrum and other issues unique to their stations. These seminars are just part of the FCC’s efforts to hold that auction in 2016, with preliminary filings by parties interested in participating potentially due later this year.

At the recent NAB Convention, there were repeated statements by FCC officials, including the Chairman himself, that the auction is on schedule to happen next year, and these officials do not seem to be concerned that the wireless companies that will buy this spectrum have stretched their financial resources to a point that would limit their participation in a 2016 auction through their spending in the recently concluded AWS-3 auction. Instead, seemingly the only thing that would slow the auction would be an adverse result in the appeals of the auction rules filed by Sinclair Broadcasting and the NAB – appeals that have been briefed and argued in front of the US Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia. A decision in this case appeal is expected by June, although the court has no official timeline for issuing its ruling. There are other potential appeals of the FCC’s auction rules that could also play into auction timing, though this case is the most advanced. FCC statements have suggested that even an adverse result could be remedied in time for the auction to occur next year – though such optimism may depend on exactly how the court rules, if the court ultimately has concerns about the issues raised in the appeal. Otherwise, the FCC is moving forward, and we expect some clarifications of some other issues very shortly.

In particular, we expect the FCC to issue an order changing its rules on post-auction channel sharing by TV stations that do not totally cease operations after the auction. In the initial order, the FCC has allowed stations to enter into channel sharing agreements, where two stations agree to share a single 6 MHz TV channel with both retaining full must-carry and retransmission consent rights, but only if those agreements were entered into before the auction, and only if they were essentially permanent agreements. Statements made at the NAB convention and elsewhere indicate that the FCC may relax those rules and allow agreements to be entered into either before or after the auction, and perhaps for a limited duration. We expect a decision on channel sharing to be released shortly, as a draft is currently circulating among the Commissioners.

These issues and others will be discussed at the upcoming FCC information sessions. The new seminars have been scheduled as follows:

 

  • May 11, 2015: Orlando, FL
  • May 12, 2015: Miami, FL
  • May 18, 2015: Boston, MA
  • May 19, 2015: Hartford, CT
  • June 1, 2015: Austin, TX
  • June 2, 2015: Dallas, TX
  • June 8, 2015: Chicago, IL
  • June 9, 2015: Milwaukee, WI

If you are interested in participating, or scheduling a private meeting in connection with one of these information sessions, contact the FCC at the address provided in the Public Notice.

Tags: FCC information sessions on incentive auction, repacking of TV spectrum, repurposing of TV spectrum for broadband, TV channel sharing
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
May Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters: LMS Migration of FCC Forms, Lowest Unit Rate Windows, EEO Audits, TV Auction, FM Antenna Rulemaking, and More
May 2, 2022
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: April 23, 2022 to April 29, 2022
May 1, 2022
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters:  March 19, 2022 to March 25, 2022
March 27, 2022

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: May 7, 2022 to May 13, 2022
  • Does the FCC Regulate Internet Content and Companies? 
  • Comments on Tests of GeoBroadcast Solutions Zonecasting System Due June 6 – What Are the Issues?
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: April 30, 2022 to May 6, 2022
  • Landowners Warned of Potential Liability of Up to $2,000,000 for Pirate Radio Operations on Their Property

Topics

  • About this Blog
  • Advertising Issues
  • AM Radio
  • Appearances
  • Assignments and Transfers
  • Broadcast Auctions
  • Broadcast Performance Royalty
  • Cable Carriage
  • Children's Programming and Advertising
  • Digital Radio
  • Digital Television
  • Drones
  • EEO Compliance/Diversity
  • Emergency Communications
  • Fairness Doctrine
  • FCC Fees
  • FCC Fines
  • FM Radio
  • FM Translators and LPFM
  • General FCC
  • Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report
  • Indecency
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet Radio
  • Internet Video
  • License Renewal
  • Low Power Television/Class A TV
  • Multiple Ownership Rules
  • Music Rights
  • Noncommercial Broadcasting
  • On Line Media
  • Payola and Sponsorship Identification
  • Podcasting
  • Political Broadcasting
  • Privacy
  • Programming Regulations
  • Public Interest Obligations/Localism
  • Security
  • Television
  • Tower Issues
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Issues
Photo of David OxenfordDavid OxenfordPartner

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the…

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the Federal Communications Commission, the Copyright Royalty Board, courts and other government agencies for over 30 years.

Show more Show less

Archives

David Oxenford logo
1800 M Street NW
Suite 800N
Washington, DC 20036
Fax: 202.783.5851
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

ABOUT

David is a partner at the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP, practicing out of its Washington, DC office. He has represented broadcasters for over 30 years on a wide array of matters from the negotiation and structuring of station purchase and sale agreements to regulatory matters. His regulatory expertise includes all areas of broadcast law including the FCC’s multiple ownership limitations, the political broadcasting rules, EEO policy, advertising issues, and other programming matters and FCC technical rules.

Read More...
Copyright © 2022, David Oxenford. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo