Skip to content

Broadcast Law Blog

Discussion of FCC, copyright, advertising and other legal issues of importance to radio and television broadcasters and other media companies

Published by
David Oxenford logo

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
David Oxenford logo

FCC Authorizes TV Channel Sharing in Preparation for Spectrum Auctions

Posted on May 1, 2012
Posted in Broadcast Auctions, Digital Television, Low Power Television/Class A TV, Television

The FCC has released the text of its Report and Order adopted last week, authorizing full power and Class A TV stations to share spectrum as part of the band clearing process for future wireless broadband spectrum auctions.  This action was authorized by Congress in the Spectrum Act, which became law in February as part of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.  We summarized the Spectrum Act in a previous blog available here.

The Report and Order allows full power and Class A TV stations to enter into agreements whereby two stations will share one six MHz channel, thereby allowing one station to return its existing channel to the FCC for cancellation and availability in the upcoming spectrum auctions.  Presumably, one six MHz channel is sufficient bandwidth to support two HD channels.  In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for this proceeding, the FCC said it would let the sharing stations decide how much bandwidth each station would get.

The station giving up its channel would be entitled to compensation in the so-called "reverse auction" to be held by the FCC, subject to receipt of compensation deemed acceptable by the licensee.  Presumably, that compensation would be shared with the station giving up part of its 6 MHz band to allow the two stations to share that bandwidth.  The amount of compensation each station would get would likely be determined in their sharing agreement.

The Commission said it would allow channel sharing agreements to be entered into between all full power and Class A stations, even if one is commercial and the other noncommercial.  The channel giving up its former frequency would not be considered a "multicast" channel.  Each station would continue to operate under its own call sign and subject to all FCC rules applicable to stations generally.  

Stations entering into channel sharing arrangements will continue to be entitled to both cable and DBS carriage, albeit from their new locations (assuming the two stations will operate from one location), subject to the usual conditions of availability, signal strength and market location.  This could result in both gains and losses of carriage.  Class A stations participating in channel sharing arrangements with full power stations will likely benefit from increased signal strength resulting in a larger viewing area.

Low power (LPTV) stations that are not operating as Class A stations cannot take advantage of this channel sharing arrangement and remain subject to displacement or worse if their particular bandwidth is needed.  It remains to be seen whether and/or how LPTV stations will be protected going forward.  Likewise, additional details of the Commission’s spectrum clearing process, including potential repacking of frequencies, remain to be seen.

 

Tags: Broadcast Auctions, cable carriage of television stations, Class A LPTV, Class A television, class A TV, Digital Television, Low Power Television/Class A TV, low power TV, sharing of TV channels, spectrum, spectrum auctions, spectrum reallocation, spectrum sharing, television, television incentive auctions
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 23, 2023 to January 30, 2023
January 29, 2023
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: December 10 to December 16, 2022
December 18, 2022
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: November 26 to December 2 , 2022
December 4, 2022

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • 5 Questions on the FCC’s EEO Obligations for Broadcasters
  • February Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters – Renewal Applications, EEO Reports, Quarterly Issues Programs Lists, Children’s Programming Reports, Copyright Fees for Webcasters, ETRS Form One, and More
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 23, 2023 to January 30, 2023
  • FCC Extends End of January Deadlines for LMS and Online Public File Documents Due to Filing System Technical Issues 
  • CRB Releases Proposed ASCAP, BMI, SESAC and GMR Rates for Noncommercial Broadcasters

Topics

  • About this Blog
  • Advertising Issues
  • AM Radio
  • Appearances
  • Assignments and Transfers
  • Broadcast Auctions
  • Broadcast Performance Royalty
  • Cable Carriage
  • Children's Programming and Advertising
  • Digital Radio
  • Digital Television
  • Drones
  • EEO Compliance/Diversity
  • Emergency Communications
  • Fairness Doctrine
  • FCC Fees
  • FCC Fines
  • FM Radio
  • FM Translators and LPFM
  • General FCC
  • Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report
  • Indecency
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet Radio
  • Internet Video
  • License Renewal
  • Low Power Television/Class A TV
  • Multiple Ownership Rules
  • Music Rights
  • Noncommercial Broadcasting
  • On Line Media
  • Payola and Sponsorship Identification
  • Podcasting
  • Political Broadcasting
  • Privacy
  • Programming Regulations
  • Public Interest Obligations/Localism
  • Security
  • Television
  • Tower Issues
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Issues
Photo of David OxenfordDavid OxenfordPartner

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the…

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the Federal Communications Commission, the Copyright Royalty Board, courts and other government agencies for over 30 years.

Show more Show less

Archives

David Oxenford logo
1800 M Street NW
Suite 800N
Washington, DC 20036
Fax: 202.783.5851
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

ABOUT

David is a partner at the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP, practicing out of its Washington, DC office. He has represented broadcasters for over 30 years on a wide array of matters from the negotiation and structuring of station purchase and sale agreements to regulatory matters. His regulatory expertise includes all areas of broadcast law including the FCC’s multiple ownership limitations, the political broadcasting rules, EEO policy, advertising issues, and other programming matters and FCC technical rules.

Read More...
Copyright © 2023, David Oxenford. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo