Skip to content

Broadcast Law Blog

Discussion of FCC, copyright, advertising and other legal issues of importance to radio and television broadcasters and other media companies

Published by
David Oxenford logo

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
David Oxenford logo

Revised Children’s Television Obligations Are on the Way

By Brendan Holland on September 27, 2006
Posted in Advertising Issues, Children's Programming and Advertising

This article is no longer available. For more information on this topic, see Telco Merger Setting a Model for the Ownership Rules Process? 

Tags: Advertising Issues, Children's Programming and Advertising
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
February Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters – Renewal Applications, EEO Reports, Quarterly Issues Programs Lists, Children’s Programming Reports, Copyright Fees for Webcasters, ETRS Form One, and More
January 31, 2023
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 23, 2023 to January 30, 2023
January 29, 2023
FCC Extends End of January Deadlines for LMS and Online Public File Documents Due to Filing System Technical Issues 
January 28, 2023

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Looking at the Some of the Policy Issues for Media and Music Companies From the Expanding Use of Artificial Intelligence
  • Broadcasters Beware – April Fools Day Can Trigger FCC Concerns
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: March 20 to March 25, 2023
  • Are Issue Ads By Non-Candidate Groups Entitled to Lowest Unit Rates Just Because a Candidate Approves the Ad?  The FCC Is Asked for Its Opinion
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: March 13 to March 17, 2023

Topics

  • About this Blog
  • Advertising Issues
  • AM Radio
  • Appearances
  • Assignments and Transfers
  • Broadcast Auctions
  • Broadcast Performance Royalty
  • Cable Carriage
  • Children's Programming and Advertising
  • Digital Radio
  • Digital Television
  • Drones
  • EEO Compliance/Diversity
  • Emergency Communications
  • Fairness Doctrine
  • FCC Fees
  • FCC Fines
  • FM Radio
  • FM Translators and LPFM
  • General FCC
  • Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report
  • Indecency
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet Radio
  • Internet Video
  • License Renewal
  • Low Power Television/Class A TV
  • Multiple Ownership Rules
  • Music Rights
  • Noncommercial Broadcasting
  • On Line Media
  • Payola and Sponsorship Identification
  • Podcasting
  • Political Broadcasting
  • Privacy
  • Programming Regulations
  • Public Interest Obligations/Localism
  • Security
  • Television
  • Tower Issues
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Issues
Photo of David OxenfordDavid OxenfordPartner

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the…

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the Federal Communications Commission, the Copyright Royalty Board, courts and other government agencies for over 30 years.

Show more Show less

Archives

David Oxenford logo
1800 M Street NW
Suite 800N
Washington, DC 20036
Fax: 202.783.5851
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

ABOUT

David is a partner at the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP, practicing out of its Washington, DC office. He has represented broadcasters for over 30 years on a wide array of matters from the negotiation and structuring of station purchase and sale agreements to regulatory matters. His regulatory expertise includes all areas of broadcast law including the FCC’s multiple ownership limitations, the political broadcasting rules, EEO policy, advertising issues, and other programming matters and FCC technical rules.

Read More...
Copyright © 2023, David Oxenford. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo