Skip to content

Broadcast Law Blog

Discussion of FCC, copyright, advertising and other legal issues of importance to radio and television broadcasters and other media companies

Published by
David Oxenford logo

Menu

HomeAboutServicesContact
David Oxenford logo

Broadcast Incentive Auction Moves Forward – Specific Auction Procedures and Opening Bids Released, Applications to Participate Due By December 18

By David Oxenford on October 19, 2015
Posted in Digital Television, Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report, Television

At the end of last week, the FCC took the expected steps of releasing its public notice setting out the specific procedures for broadcasters interested in participating in the incentive auction by selling their spectrum back to the FCC to be repurposed for wireless broadband, and a notice setting out the specific opening prices that each full-power and Class A TV station will be offered in the auction. These notices also set December 18 as the deadline for stations to submit a new Form 177, declaring if they are interested in participating in the auction.  While the dollar numbers to buy out stations perhaps got the most attention, stations need to remember that they are only opening prices – prices which will fall in the reverse auction process until the FCC has only enough interest in stations selling their spectrum to meet its spectrum clearing target.  But the release of the numbers and the deadline for participation highlights for many stations the need to focus on the realities of the auction and make their plans for participation (or non-participation) accordingly.

The incentive auction procedures public notice is one that broadcasters need to carefully review and, for those intending to offer their spectrum for sale, to have their economic advisors review as well.  Not only does the notice provide information about forms to be completed and the specific steps to be taken by broadcasters to participate in the auction, but it also includes exhibits setting out the mathematical models used by the FCC to determine the descending prices to be offered to broadcasters as the auction continues and when the offers will be frozen (meaning that the FCC has accepted the station’s offer to vacate their current channel, subject to the success of the forward auction raising sufficient funds to pay out the amounts offered to the broadcasters).  Exhibits setting out the formulas used to calculate interference between broadcasters remaining after the auction and wireless users are also included in exhibits to the notice.  What are some of the other specific issues for broadcasters addressed in the notice?

Initially, one is struck by the number of cautions included in the notice, warning broadcasters to make sure that they know what they are doing, that they are familiar with the auction rules, and that they don’t fall for fraudulent schemes that may arise around the auction or inadvertently violate some of the auction rules (especially the rules against prohibited communications, generally referred to as the anti-collusion rules, about which we wrote here).  But perhaps most fundamentally, the FCC wants to make sure that an inadvertent bid, or one by an unauthorized individual, does not result in a broadcaster agreeing to surrender their channel and cease operations.

Initially, the application will set out the bidding options that the broadcaster is willing to consider – being bought out entirely, moving from a UHF or high VHF to a low VHF channel, or moving from a UHF channel to a high VHF channel.    Selling out entirely will obviously result in a bigger payout than the moving-to-VHF options, and the FCC makes clear that if a station does not elect to accept the buy-out option in its initial application, it will not be able to reconsider and adopt that option later.  Listing the buy-out option in the December filing does not bind a station to accept that option – that is done in a subsequent filing just before the March start of the auction.  But a buy-out option will not be on the table if it is not listed on the December filing.

The FCC also describes the process for filing the Form 177, evidencing a station’s intent to participate in the auction, during the window between December 1 and December 18. That from will require information including the licensee’s name, the owners of 10% or more of the licensee, the names of up to three people authorized to bid on behalf of the company, and certifications that the licensee is familiar with all of the auction rules.  For noncommercial stations, the form requires that the station indicate if it is operating on a reserved band, and for Class A stations, the form will require a certification that the station will continue to meet the obligations for Class A status throughout the auction.

Any channel sharing agreements must also be identified in the form.  Full copies of the agreement, with no redactions, must also be submitted.  All parties to the agreement must be named in the form.  For stations that have not yet entered into a channel sharing agreement, but who hope to be able to do so after the auction, that hope is also to be noted.  Even for stations that have entered into channel sharing agreements before the filing of the application can indicate that they hope to enter into channel sharing agreements after the auction in the event that their primary agreement falls through for one reason or another (e.g. a price floor set out in the agreement was not met).  Various other disclosures and certifications regarding channel sharing are also required – including certifications that the agreement meets the FCC rules and will not create any new multiple ownership rule issues.  For more on channel sharing, see our article here.

The FCC also makes clear that stations that owe money to the FCC, or which could potentially owe money to the FCC, will not be let off the hook by selling their stations in the incentive auction.  Instead, if the station has any “red light” issues for unpaid fees, or any pending actions that could lead to a fine by the FCC, and if that licensee is potentially going to sell all of its stations in the auction, the FCC will withhold a portion of the auction distribution to cover that liability to the FCC.

After the filing of the application, the FCC will contact each individual bidder by confidential letter to let them know if the application was complete.  The letter will say if the station has any potential liabilities to the FCC that would need to be satisfied out of the auction proceeds.  Finally, instructions for submitting the commitment to carry forward with the relinquishment option selected by the station will be included in the letter.  That commitment will be due by March 29.

A subsequent letter will be issued once the FCC decides how much spectrum it will try to clear.  That letter will tell the applicant if its station is in fact needed in the auction based on the spectrum clearing target and the commitments of other stations.  Once the auction begins bids will be taken either online or by phone, with secure ID numbers generated by FCC-provided fobs to necessary to place any bid to ensure security.

For more on the auction generally, see the information that we presented to a number of state broadcast associations, available through our article here.  The procedures notice contains much other information that auction participants need to review. This includes information about keeping the application information up to date, and dates for auction tutorials and mock auctions after the submission of the initial applications.  This is very complicated information, and broadcasters interested in participating in the auction need to carefully review the documents released last week to make sure that they are ready for the upcoming deadline.

Tags: FCC Form 177, repurposing of TV spectrum for broadband, TV channel sharing
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: November 26 to December 2 , 2022
December 4, 2022
September Regulatory Dates for Broadcasters:  Reg Fees, Foreign Government Program Certifications, Final Chance to Claim Reimbursement for Repacking Expenses, Comments on ATSC 3.0 and FTC Advertising Inquiry, and More
August 28, 2022
This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: July 30, 2022 to August 5, 2022
August 7, 2022

Stay Connected

Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter

Recent Posts

  • CRB Releases Proposed ASCAP, BMI, SESAC and GMR Rates for Noncommercial Broadcasters
  •  An Overview of the Hot Policy Topics in Music Licensing
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 15, 2023 to January 22, 2023
  • This Week in Regulation for Broadcasters: January 7, 2023 to January 14, 2023
  • Broadcasters’ Calendar – A Look Ahead to the Regulatory Dates for 2023

Topics

  • About this Blog
  • Advertising Issues
  • AM Radio
  • Appearances
  • Assignments and Transfers
  • Broadcast Auctions
  • Broadcast Performance Royalty
  • Cable Carriage
  • Children's Programming and Advertising
  • Digital Radio
  • Digital Television
  • Drones
  • EEO Compliance/Diversity
  • Emergency Communications
  • Fairness Doctrine
  • FCC Fees
  • FCC Fines
  • FM Radio
  • FM Translators and LPFM
  • General FCC
  • Incentive Auctions/Broadband Report
  • Indecency
  • Intellectual Property
  • Internet Radio
  • Internet Video
  • License Renewal
  • Low Power Television/Class A TV
  • Multiple Ownership Rules
  • Music Rights
  • Noncommercial Broadcasting
  • On Line Media
  • Payola and Sponsorship Identification
  • Podcasting
  • Political Broadcasting
  • Privacy
  • Programming Regulations
  • Public Interest Obligations/Localism
  • Security
  • Television
  • Tower Issues
  • Trademark
  • Uncategorized
  • Website Issues
Photo of David OxenfordDavid OxenfordPartner

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the…

David Oxenford represents broadcasting and digital media companies in connection with regulatory, transactional and intellectual property issues. He has represented broadcasters and webcasters before the Federal Communications Commission, the Copyright Royalty Board, courts and other government agencies for over 30 years.

Show more Show less

Archives

David Oxenford logo
1800 M Street NW
Suite 800N
Washington, DC 20036
Fax: 202.783.5851
Subscribe to this blog via RSS Follow Me on Twitter
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

ABOUT

David is a partner at the law firm of Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP, practicing out of its Washington, DC office. He has represented broadcasters for over 30 years on a wide array of matters from the negotiation and structuring of station purchase and sale agreements to regulatory matters. His regulatory expertise includes all areas of broadcast law including the FCC’s multiple ownership limitations, the political broadcasting rules, EEO policy, advertising issues, and other programming matters and FCC technical rules.

Read More...
Copyright © 2023, David Oxenford. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo