Legalized Marijuana - Why Broadcasters Should be Wary

As personal marijuana use becomes decriminalized in the states of Washington and Colorado, we once again repeat our warning to broadcasters who may be looking to pot sales as a new source of advertising revenue – remember that the Federal government still thinks that the drug is illegal. The US Attorney's Office in Seattle has reportedly issued a statement reminding residents in Washington State of that fact, and told Washingtonians that the Department of Justice plans to enforce Federal law on all Federal properties in the state. How does this affect broadcasters? 

Broadcasters are Federal licensees. Thus, there still is a concern that advertising for an activity that is considered a felony under Federal law might present problems if a license renewal is challenged or a complaint is filed.  It is Federal law, of course, that governs the issuance and renewal of FCC licenses. No FCC official has been willing to say that advertising medical marijuana is permissible (and, as we wrote last year, a US attorney in California threatened to prosecute media outlets advertising medical marijuana clinics and to possibly seize property used for such advertising). As Washington state officials discuss how to license stores to sell pot under its new laws, some broadcasters may eye these stores, once authorized, as a potential new source of advertising revenue.  Especially with license renewal now underway for radio stations in Colorado, and soon coming up for TV stations in Colorado and for broadcasters in Washington, now is probably not the time to press the limits of advertising a product with such an ambiguous legal status. 

We note that universities in Washington are apparently facing a similar risk, as many get Federal funding for many research projects and other on-campus activities.  Thus, these institutions are reportedly being cautious in their tolerance of marijuana use on their properties.  On the medical marijuana side, we also hear often from broadcasters that they see their local newspapers running ads for local dispensaries.  However, newspapers do not operate with a Federal license, so their considerations in deciding whether to run such ads may be different from those of Federally licensed broadcasters (though note the US attorney's statements we referenced above might give any advertising outlet pause on how to proceed).  In any event, while this may look like an enticing source of revenues, we don't want your license to go up in smoke, so we urge caution. 

California Federal Prosecutor States Interest In Prosecuting Broadcast Stations for Medical Marijuana Advertising

The tenuous legal status of marijuana advertising on broadcast stations just got a little more tenuous as a Federal prosecutor in Southern California has reportedly indicated an intent to prosecute radio and TV stations, as well as newspapers and magazines, that advertise medical marijuana clinics.  As we have written before, advertising such clinics was always a legal grey area, as marijuana use and possession is still a Federal felony, even though many states have passed laws to decriminalize the use of medical marijuana.  While the Federal Department of Justice had indicated that marijuana prosecutions were a low priority for prosecution, as the number of medical marijuana clinics have mushroomed in many states, and the controls exercised over them by state authorities have been lax, some Federal prosecutors have seemingly taken action on their own (as we warned was possible in a prior article on medical marijuana advertising).  The prosecutor in Southern California has indicated an interest in going after property owners who lease space to clinics, and now seemingly has expanded her interest into going after media outlets who advertise for such clinics. 

Whether or not these prosecutions will be successful on their own may be subject to debate, but broadcasters, as Federal licensees, need to be particularly careful in their actions.  There is rumored to be at least one complaint pending at the FCC against a broadcaster who ran medical marijuana ads.  As an agency of the Federal government, whose Justice Department has said that pot is not a legal drug, the FCC would be hard-pressed to say that it is alright for a station to advertise for a marijuana clinic.  With license renewals now pending or about to be filed by all broadcast stations, the opportunities for more objections, and sanctions based on any such complaint, are many.  So, once again, we caution restraint when a broadcast station is offered the opportunity to make a few dollars from a clinics ads.  The dollars you make may be far overshadowed by the dollars you spend defending a legal action - whether it be before the FCC or before a Federal court.  So think twice!

 
<--!
-->