Processing of New NCE Applications Proceeds - FCC Releases Fair Distribution Analysis for 26 Groups of Noncommercial FM Applicants

The FCC's staff today issued an Order resolving 26 Groups of mutually exclusive FM applications submitted last year in the filing window for new noncommercial FM stations. We wrote about a previous order in August, processing a smaller group of such applicants.  In each of these groups, the Commission analyzed the coverage proposed by the applicants to determine if the technical service that they propose to provide was superior to that of other applicants - a "fair distribution analysis."  In these cases, the Commission found that one applicant was preferred under an analysis that looks at the populations to be served by these applicants that do not already currently receive service from more than one noncommercial station.  The "tentative selectees" of the Commission are now subject to the filing of petitions to deny and, if no petitions are filed in the 30 day filing window, these applications will be granted. 

This Order did not deal with cases where there was no dispositive preference based on coverage - cases where the FCC will have to conduct a "points system" analysis (see our summary of those factors here).  Presumably, those will come later.  For parties who had applications on the Order and who were not winners, a review of the decision is in order.  The Commission has been known to make mistakes in this kind of analysis and, as much reliance is put on information supplied by applicants, some of the information may not be correct, or may not rely on consistent assumptions applied in the same way in counting the populations served by each applicant.  We've heard that there may be some of these windows where the winning applicant ignored (or asked for a waiver of) the limitations on the power of noncommercial stations near Channel 6 TV stations, on the theory that most of these TV stations, operating adjacent to the FM band, will be going away in February after the digital television conversion.  This is a controversial issue (see our post here on the Commission's action with respect to applications to improve existing stations that relied on the same assumptions), which may well be challenged in reconsideration filings if these rumors are true.  So, as always, stay tuned to see how this process develops. 

NCE Application Processing Marches On - FCC Identifies A Number of Groups of Mutually Exclusive Applications

The processing of the applications for new noncommercial FM stations marches on.  This week, the FCC released a list of groups of Mutually Exclusive applications (commonly known by those who regularly deal with the FCC as "MX groups"), i.e. applications that are linked together in that, because of interference concerns, not all can be granted.  In some cases, all of the applications in an MX group overlap with each other so that only one can be granted.  In other cases, referred to as "daisy chains", you have a situation where Application A precludes Application B from being granted, and Application B prevents Application C from being granted.  While A and C could be granted if not for B, all three end up in a single MX group.  According to the Public Notice released with the list of MX groups, the applications on this list are all situations were there are 13 or fewer applicants in the MX group.  MX groups with a greater number of applications will appear on a subsequent public notice.  MX Groups with 4 or fewer applications were identified back in March.

The Commission has advised all applicants to review the lists to see if they were included in an MX group erroneously or omitted from an MX group in which they should have been included.  If they discover a mistake, the applicant should file, within 30 days, notice with the FCC so that its application can be processed with the group to which it belongs.  Applicants can also try to work out settlements during the 30 day comment period (or notify the FCC at the end of the period that they are still working on a settlement).  Otherwise, at the end of the 30 day period the FCC promises to begin work to resolve the MX cases through the use of the point system (which we explained, here).  So the process marches on, and we should start to see more applications from the noncommercial filing window acted on in the coming months.

Details on the Noncommercial Filing Window

In its Public Notice setting out the rules governing the upcoming filing window for applicants seeking new noncommercial FM stations or major changes in existing stations, which we wrote about here, the FCC has put applicants on notice of the many requirements that must be met in order to have an application considered in the upcoming process.  This is the first opportunity in this century for the filing of applications for new noncommercial FM stations. In order to participate, all applicants must make sure that they follow the rules set out by the Commission.  Applications will be due in a filing window that will open on October 12 and close on October 19.

Fundamentally, the FCC's Public Notice reminds interested parties that, to be eligible, an applicant must be a noncommercial entity – a nonprofit corporation or a governmental organization.  Individual applicants or profit-making entities cannot participate.  As eligibility to participate and the comparative qualifications of all applicants are assessed at the time of filing, applicants need to assure their nonprofit status is in order before the upcoming filing window.

The Commission also sets out a number of other requirement for the applications that may be filed during the window. Applications submitted during the window will be filed electronically on FCC Form 340, and must contain very specific technical descriptions of the service they plan. The proposal must specify facilities that don’t interfere with other existing stations or pending “cut-off” noncommercial applications. The applicant must have received reasonable assurance of the availability of its proposed transmitter site (i.e. a legally binding contract is not necessary, but a commitment from the site owner that the site will be available and an idea of the terms on which that availability is premised must be obtained). 

These specific technical parameters are necessary so that the Commission can judge whether or not an application is mutually exclusive with other applications filed during the window. In other words, the FCC will review an application to determine if the technical facilities that it proposes can be granted immediately, or if the application and other applications filed during the same window cannot all be granted without creating prohibited interference. If an application is mutually exclusive with another application, and the applicants cannot submit to the FCC a settlement agreement providing a technical solution to resolve the mutual exclusivity, the Commission will review the applications using a system it has adopted to determine which application should be granted

The first level of review to determine which mutually exclusive application should be granted is what the Commission calls a “Fair Distribution Analysis” of the coverage of the proposed stations as specified in the applications submitted during the window. If a station covers any area that currently has fewer than 2 noncommercial radio services, and that area exceeds 10% of the proposed service area of the applicant covering more than 2000 people, a conclusive preference will be awarded over another applicant who does not meet that threshold. The Public Notice makes clear that the coverage of the proposed stations, and the other services that exist within the service area, will be assessed at the close of the upcoming filing window. In preparing an analysis of the other noncommercial stations that currently provide service to a specific area, an applicant should take into account both existing stations and construction permits for new noncommercial stations that have not yet commenced operations.

If there is no preference under the Fair Distribution Analysis, then the FCC will look to its “point system” to determine who will receive a construction permit to build the new station. The point system looks at several factors. First, the Commission will look to determine if the applicant is an established local organization – meaning that for two years its headquarters or campus or the residence of 75% of its Board of Directors, is within 25 miles of the reference coordinates of the city of license of the proposed station. Local applicants receive 3 points. Second, the FCC looks to see if the proposal is for a station that will be part of a statewide network operated by an entity with multiple educational institutions throughout a state (the specifics set out in the rules). If an application is part of such a statewide network, then 2 points will be awarded to the applicant.  Third, applicants that have no other local media interests will be given 2 points in the Commission's diversity analysis (though an applicant cannot get credit both for diversity and for being a state-wide network). A media interest for purposes of this analysis is an interest in a full power radio or television station, an FM radio translator (not a fill-in translator) or a Class A TV station. Finally, points will be given to the applicant with the largest coverage area - one point if an applicant covers 10% more area and population than its competitor, two points if it covers 25% more area and population.  If applicants are tied after the points analysis, tiebreakers looking at the applicant's total number of media interests will be used. 

Each element of the point system is evaluated as of the date for the close of the filing window. The Public Notice makes clear that, after that date, the comparative position of the applicant will not get better, but can get worse. In other words, the post-filing receipt of another broadcast interest will count against the applicant, but the divestiture of an interest will not improve the applicant’s position. However, the FCC indicates that it may entertain waivers of this requirement, and allow applicants to keep non fill-in translators (i.e. translators that extend the converge area of a noncommercial station) if the applicant proposes a station that will serve the same area as the translator and promises to turn in the license upon grant of a full power station sought in this window.  The Notice makes the same statement with respect to LPFM (low power FM) stations, although the rules do not specifically state that an LPFM counts against an applicant in a diversity analysis.  In any event, the LPFM would have to be divested before a full-power station commences operations, as an LPFM licensee cannot own a full power station.

By a separate Public Notice, the FCC also asks for comments on whether it should limit the number of applications that one party can file in the noncommercial window. The Commission tentatively concludes that, to avoid huge numbers of application that could clog its processing ability and could lead to “daisy chains” of competing applicants that could take years to process (a daisy chain being a situation where applicant A prevents that grant of applicant B, which in turn blocks the grant of applicant C, which in turn blocks the grant of applicant D. Even though A and D could be both be granted, because of the intervening applications, all four must be comparatively considered. These daisy chains, in other services, have involved hundreds of applicants stretching over many states). The ten station limit would not include major change applications, nor would it include those applications that were filed under old noncommercial processing rules (some over 10 years old) that could not be processed until the Commission opened this window (such applicants have to file amendments to their old applications to request processing in the new window, and to submit their old applications in electronic form).  Comments on this proposed limit will be due 15 days after the proposal is published in the Federal Register.

With so many considerations to weigh, applicants that have not yet started their consideration of filing noncommercial applications during the upcoming window need to do so now, as there is much to accomplish before the filing deadline. Engineering counsel and legal assistance should be sought immediately because as the window approaches, lawyers and engineers may well not have time to assist last-minute potential applicants finish the necessary preparations for filing.  So act now - as who knows when the next filing window will open.

FCC Issues Rules on Digital Radio - With Some Surprises that Could Eventually Impact Analog Operations

The FCC today issued the long-awaited text of its decision on Digital Audio radio - the so-called IBOC system.  As we have written, while adopted at its March meeting, the text of the decision has been missing in action.  With the release of the decision, which is available here, the effective date of the new rules can be set in the near future - 30 days after its publication in the Federal Register.  With the Order, the Commission also released its Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, addressing a host of new issues - some not confined to digital radio, but instead affecting the obligations of all radio operations.

The text provides the details for many of the actions that were announced at the March meeting, including authorizing the operation of AM stations in a digital mode at night, and the elimination of the requirements that stations ask permission for experimental operations before commencing multicast operations.  The Order also permits the use of dual antennas - one to be used solely for digital use - upon notification to the FCC.  In addition, the order addresses several other matters not discussed at the meeting, as set forth below. 

The additional actions taken by the FCC and announced in the Order include the following:
  • Holding that a party that does a time brokerage agreement for more than 15% of any digital stream offered by another station has an attributable interest in the full station.  Thus, an owner who has a full complement of stations that he owns in a market cannot exceed the multiple ownership limitations by programming a digital over-the-air stream of another broadcaster in his market.
  • Rejected all objections to full-powered operations by grandfathered super-powered stations and short-spaced stations, finding that such a limitation was beyond the scope of this proceeding, and that no compelling reason for these limitations had been shown - but promised to monitor the situation.
  • Delayed consideration of whether noncommercial stations could use some of their digital capacity to offer commercial programming.
  • Permitted time brokerage of digital channels under the same rules that apply to a station's main analog channel.
  • Found it premature to adopt rules for the full transition to digital operations -  and adopted no obligations for any minimum operations in digital.  So the choice of whether to operate digitally is fully up to the broadcaster.
  • Limited operation of subscription services on digital channels to those specifically authorized following a request for experimental authority, until after the Commission completes consideration of the comments filed in response to its Further Notice.
  • Applied most standard programming obligations to digital streams - including the political rules and sponsorship identification (including payola rules).
  • Applied EAS rules to digital radio channels just as they apply to analog channels.
  • Adopted station identification rules requiring that the station use its main station call letters, followed by the community of license, and some identification, either orally or in text on the digital receiver,  that a listener is listening to a digital stream (e.g. "This is WXYZ digital channel 1, Anytown, USA").  As with a station's normal legal ID, the frequency of the station can be inserted between the call letters and the city of license.

In addition to these rules, the FCC adopted a Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.  Not only does this Further Notice address the issues listed above of allowing the commercial use of some digital capacity of noncommercial stations, and allowing the use of subscription services on digital streams, but it goes much further.  It suggests a number of revisions to FCC rules  - some of which would apply to analog as well as digital operations.  These include:

  • A proposal that public files for radio stations be kept digitally on a station's website.
  • The possible use of a standardized disclosure statement for reporting the public interest performance of broadcasters.
  • The possible elimination of relaxed main studio and program origination requirements, which no longer require the origination of any programming at a main studio.
  • A possible requirement that stations be manned, cutting back on recent Commission rulings that allow for unmanned, automated operations during nighttime and weekend hours.  in particular, the FCC points to the automation of EAS and how that has led to some problems in cases of off-hours emergencies.

Addressing these most important issues will need careful attention from broadcasters, as these issues may well impact all stations - not just those who choose to operate digitally.  Comments will be due 60 days after the Order is published in the Federal Register.  Replies will be due 30 days later.