FCC Adopts New Ex Parte Rules Setting Out What Must Be Disclosed By Parties Lobbying the FCC

When the FCC looks to adopt new rules or policies through rulemaking proceedings or through other significant cases, there are often companies, associations and individuals trying to influence the decision on these matters.  Such discussions with FCC decision makers are permitted, but the parties trying to influence the FCC's decisions must file notices in the Docket of the proceeding on which they were commenting, summarizing the discussions that were had, and the issues that were discussed.  These notices are called "ex parte notices" and the rules dealing with the disclosure of the lobbying being done on these FCC issues are called the "ex parte" rules.  The FCC has just issued a Report and Order that revises and updates those rules to require more detailed and frequent disclosures.  Our Davis Wright Tremaine advisory on these updates  is now available.

The changes include clarifications that require written disclosures even if the parties involved don't believe that any new information was conveyed or new arguments raised, mandatory electronic filing of most notices, an extra day to file most ex parte notices (two business days instead of one), but expedited filing in cases where presentations are made in or close to the "sunshine period" (the period just before the decision, when comments to decision makers are generally limited to those requested by the FCC staff).  The FCC also decided, for now, not to include ex parte filing obligations in connection with comments made on the FCC's social media sites (e.g. its blogs, twitter feed and Facebook pages).  Finally, the Commission asked for more comments on whether there should be corporate disclosures made in connection with ex parte notices - whether companies should be required to identify their communications interests and whether trade and public interest groups should be required to identify who supports these groups positions.  Comments on how such a requirement could be implemented, and whether the burden that it imposes would be worth the benefit it provides, are due 45 days after publication of the notice in the Federal Register.  Again, for more information, look at the Order, or at our firm's Advisory.   Be sure to comply with these rules, as one of the order charged the Office of General Counsel and the FCC's Enforcement Bureau with policing violations of the rules, and authorizing fines for repeated or egregious violations. 

FCC Looks to Revise Ex Parte Rules - How Much Public Disclosure is Necesary When Lobbying the FCC?

When someone "lobbies" the FCC on issues pending in a rulemaking proceeding or other contested case, the Commission requires that there be a certain amount of disclosure of the communications made to Commission decision-making personnel.  The rules governing the communications with the FCC's decision-making personnel in such cases are called the "ex parte" rules.  These rules preclude some communications entirely (e.g. oral communications trying to influence a decision in a contested individual case unless all parties to the case are present, or any presentations in rulemakings in the last week before the FCC meeting at which it will be considered), and allow some communications, but with disclosure to the public (e.g. comments made to FCC Commissioners by parties, written or oral, in rulemaking proceedings).  The FCC has just commenced a new proceeding to look at whether the disclosures that are made after some of the communications with decision makers are detailed enough, and also whether new technologies used by the FCC (like its Blogs for various subjects including the blog dedicated to comments on the Future of the Media Proceeding, about we've written before) make some of the ex parte rules outmoded.

A full summary of the proceeding is available in our Davis Wright Tremaine advisory, here.   Comments are due 45 days after the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in this proceeding is published in the Federal Register.