Posted on October 13, 2009 by David Oxenford

Copyright Royalty Board Requires Census Reporting for All Webcasters Except for Small Broadcasters

The Copyright Royalty Board has ordered that most digital music services provide "census reporting" of all songs played by their service, along with other information including the number of listeners who heard each song each time it was played.  The decision, published in the Federal Register today, is a follow up to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking about which we wrote here, proposing this new permanent rule to replace the interim requirements that required that digital music services provide that information for two weeks each quarter.  The only exception to the new obligation was for "small broadcasters" - i.e. those broadcasters who are only obligated to pay the minimum $500 annual royalty. These small broadcasters will continue to report on the songs that they play for only two weeks each quarter.

The new general rule requiring census reporting applies to all digital music services that pay royalties to SoundExchange for the public performance of sound recordings. However, the obligations set out in this general rule do not replace different rules that may be contained in settlement agreements entered into between services and SoundExchange.  Settlements with recordkeeping exemptions include the broadcaster settlement (summarized here), which give stations the ability to exclude some of their tuning hours from the census reporting requirements that were included in that settlement, and the noncommercial settlement agreements summarized here.  The CRB decision also excludes those services where per performance reporting is not possible (such as satellite radio services where there is no easy way to count performances). 

For nonsubscription webcasters, the recordkeeping requirements require monthly Reports of Use which must contain information including:

  • The name of the service
  • The type of service (specific categories including broadcast music simulcast, broadcast simulcast of news program, music webcast)
  • The featured artist
  • The name of the song
  • The ISRC Code of the song or, instead of the ISRC Code, the following information:
    • Album Title
    • Marketing Label
  • The number of performances of each sound recording

The details of the obligations for webcasters and other digital services are set out in the rules published in today's Federal Register.  These are not easy rules to meet without using one of the commercial services that assist in counting performances.  These services can also assist services in completing the digital reporting requirements set out in the rules.  Digital services that use music should carefully review these rules to make sure that they are following the requirements set out in these rules.  In recent meetings, SoundExchange has indicated that it is going to emphasize reporting requirements, and potentially take action against webcasters who ignore their obligations.  Don't become an example.
Tags: , , , , ,
Posted on April 26, 2009 by David Oxenford

Internet Radio Royalty Reminders - April 30 is the Last Date to Elect Small Webcaster Agreement and for Broadcasters to Pay Past Fees, and Don't Forget the Recordkeeping Obligations

We recently wrote about the agreements between SoundExchange and various groups of webcasters, which became effective under the terms of the Webcasters Settlement Act.  These rates act as a substitute for the rates set by the 2007 Copyright Royalty Board decision  setting Internet radio royalties for the use of sound recordings in the period from 2006-2010.  The deal with broadcasters set lower rates than the CRB for 2009 and 2010, and also waived certain requirements otherwise applicable to webcasters, limiting the number of songs from the same artist that can be played in a given period of time (see our posts here and here).  There is also a deal that SoundExchange unilaterally advanced to certain small webcasters which allows for a percentage of revenue royalty, but limits the amount of listening to these webcasters allowed at these rates, and imposes significant recapture fees if a webcaster sells its service to another company that would not qualify as a small webcaster (see our post here).  April 30 is an important date under both deals, as it is the date by which small webcasters must elect the deal, and the date by which all broadcasters who elected the broadcaster deal earlier this month are to pay any back royalties which they owe for streaming from 2006 through the date of the agreement.

In talking to Internet radio operators, both broadcasters and small webcasters, many seem to be unaware of the records that need to be maintained to remain in compliance with the requirements of the deals.  Both the small webcasters agreement and the NAB-SoundExchange settlement require "full census" reporting of  all songs played by the service, which will include information for every song - including the name of the song that was played, the featured artist who performed the song, the album on which the song appeared, and the label on which the album was released.  In addition, the webcaster must report on the number of times each song was played, and how many people heard each transmission of the song.  Only very small broadcasters and "microcasters" under the small commercial webcaster deal, are totally exempt from these requirements.  Under their deal, broadcasters need not provide all the information for up to 20% of their programming, but this percentage of the broadcast week that can avoid full reporting will shrink every year (see our post here for details).

These are not statistics that can be easily gathered in-house by most webcasters.  Instead, most broadcasters or webcasters need to make sure they have a service that can provide this information.  Many content delivery networks now bundle this information with their services, and stand-alone services like that provided by Ando Media can track this information.  Some of these services will prepare all the reports of use that are required by SoundExchange and, for broadcasters, the statements of account that compute the number of performances that are necessary to determine the monthly fees that are now due from broadcasters - to be paid 45 days after the end of each month.  So broadcasters should make sure that they are using such a service to track their listening, so that they can be ready to pay their fees for streaming done in March by May 15. 

Lots of detailed information is required, and lots of statistics - so be sure that you are ready to comply. 
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted on December 30, 2008 by David Oxenford

Copyright Royalty Board Proposes Full "Census" Reporting for Services Paying Royalties to SoundExchange

 Just when you think that the year will come to a quiet end, something always seems to pop up.  Today, the Copyright Royalty Board announced a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would change the reporting requirements for services that pay royalties for the use of sound recordings to SoundExchange.  The proposed new rules would require that Reports of Use submitted by services relying on the statutory royalty contain "full census reporting" of all songs played by any service.  Services would include all users of music who pay royalties due under Sections 112 or 114 of the Copyright Act - including Internet Radio, satellite radio, digital cable radio, digitally transmitted business establishment services, and radio-like services delivered by other digital means, including deliveries to cell phones. This reporting requirement would replace the current system, about which we wrote here, that only requires reporting for two weeks each quarter.  Under the new rules, an Internet radio service would have to submit the name of every song that they play to SoundExchange, along with information as to how many times that song played, the name of the featured artist, and either the recording's ISRC code or both the album title and label.  Comments on this proposal are due by January 29.

Currently, the quarterly reports are filed electronically using an ASCII format and using either an Excel or Quattro Pro spreadsheet template as created by SoundExchange.  The Board asks for comments as to whether there are technological impediments to providing this information in this manner, and if other changes should be made to more easily facilitate the delivery of this information.  The Copyright Royalty Judges who make up the CRB expressed their opinion that the full census reporting is preferable to the limited information now provided, so that SoundExchange does not need to rely on estimates or projections to insure that all artists are fairly compensated when their works are played.  Using census reporting, all artists can be paid based on how often their songs are actually played.

The CRB did note that there is still the need for some approximation for certain services that pay the royalties.  For instance, as satellite radio (Sirius XM) and digital cable radio do not have the technology to compute how many listeners are listening to every song, they have to come up with some proxies for that number based on how often the song was played.  In the Internet radio world, small webcasters already had agreed to census reporting in the Small Webcasters Settlement Act, and the requirement was carried forward under the unilateral deal extended by SoundExchange to some small webcasters last year (see our article here).  Large webcasters agreed to this reporting as part of their deal to limit the minimum fees which would have otherwise been due under the CRB decision (see our summary here). 

Where this change is likely to have the most impact is in connection with the operations of broadcasters who also stream their programs on the Internet.  Noncommercial broadcasters, such as college radio stations, have repeatedly complained that their small staffs to not have the ability to maintain these electronic records, especially where the stations are volunteer-programmed by DJs who select their own music on the spot.  Some of the most creative and eclectic of broadcasters may have the most problem with this rule.  Commercial broadcasters have also had difficulty with the reporting requirements, especially when dealing with syndicated programming, where the syndicator does not provide the necessary information about the recordings that it includes in its programming to the stations that carry such programs.  Some of the current systems used for paying the royalties have had difficulty tracking the number of "performances" (songs played times the listeners to each song) played by broadcasters using syndicated programming, and these problems will only be magnified by the adoption of this proposal.

Parties that will be impacted by this proposal should start gathering their information now, and be prepared to file comments on the proposed increase in reporting information by the January 29 deadline.  If there are improvements that can be made in the system, now is the time to ask. 
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
  • Email This
  • Print
  • Comments (7)
  • Share Link